Posts Tagged ‘Aesthetics’

The definitive version…

The last post touched on having too many versions of works. I don’t think John Cage would have cared about having too many versions. In a 1986 interview with Richard Kostelanetz, Cage described the process of cutting and splicing tape to create his landmark Williams Mix. During the course of the interview it became clear that the 1958 recording of Williams Mix wasn’t an 8-track recording, but eight mono tapes played live by different machines. In other words, this was just one version of the piece because the eight tapes could never be synchronized in the same way again. Each performance would be different. This seemed to surprise Kostelanetz who begins the following line of questioning.

RK: So, therefore, the version on that record is not definitive.

JC: I’ve all along spoken against records at the same time that I’ve permitted their being made and have even encouraged it; but I’ve always said that a record is not faithful to the nature of music.

RK: Which can only exist in a live performance situation.

JC: Right. I’ve always been a proper member of the musicians’ union, in favor of live music.

RK: And what is your instrument of virtuosity?

JC: I’m listed in the union as a pianist.

I have eight versions of the Rolling Stones’s “You Can’t Always Get What You Want” on my hard drive. Fans cherish all those versions–electric, acoustic, slower, faster, with choir, without. People really seem to like when a new version contains unique text or even a new verse (remember the scandalous secret verse of “Friends in Low Places”?). But these differences are not at all like when eight different orchestras record their interpretations of Beethoven’s 9th. I can’t imagine anyone changing the instrumentation, keys or rhythmic structures of the Beethoven (or moreover, adding a verse to Schiller’s “Ode to Joy”). Sure, you get different dynamics, tempi, accents, balance among parts, and rate of change, but every recording will generally conform to the definitive, or “authentic,” version–i.e. the score (or is it?).

The Stones don’t use scores, but Cage does. He is able to craft a score that can be performed in countless expectationless ways. The Williams Mix score is a graphic score that shows “staves” that represent the tape and lines and shapes for cut marks. Here’s an excerpt from the unpublished score:

In 2001 composer Larry Austin completed his piece Williams [re]Mix[ed] using Cage’s score. I haven’t heard it, but at 19 minutes, it’s nearly four times longer than Cage’s version. On the [re]Mix[ed] website, Austin writes, “On the last page of the score for Williams Mix, Cage inscribed, ‘(4 min. 15 sec. +) End 1st Part. N.Y.C. Oct. ’52 Splicing finished Jan. 16, 1953.’ Dare I imagine that John’s spirit is slyly laughing now, asking the oracle, ‘Is this the 2nd Part ?’”

Music of the Spheres

From Gioseffo Zarlino, Istitutioni harmoniche (1558)

…The Pythagoreans in particular believed that the world was composed musically, and that the heavens caused harmony in their revolutions, and that our soul is formed according to the same laws, and that it is awakened and its powers vivified by songs and instrumental music.

The ancient Greeks (and the Renaissance writers like Zarlino who brought the ancients to the… early modernists) believed that the movement of heavenly bodies was just like the movement of musical tones and harmonies.  This was called musica universalis or music of the universe (as opposed to music of the body–singing–and instrumental music).  I’ve always been moved by this idea and wondered what these sounds would be–not just harmonically, but timbally as well (Just to clarify, you can’t really HEAR musica universalis.  In addition to it having always been more metaphorical, sound doesn’t exist in the vacuum of space.  Don’t tell George Lucas.).  I don’t know if I’ve been unduly influenced by Star Trek IV, but when I close my eyes and see Jupiter whoosh past Saturn, I hear whale song.

Many cultures and religions place special meaning on certain numbers, but I don’t know of any that do the same with ratios.  I think if we’re talking about harmony of the spheres, then we need to get to the ratios of the movements of the planets.  I can’t really get into it here, but I would really like to explore these harmonies sometime.

Over the past week I’ve enjoyed reading about the mythical beginnings of music.  The Greeks said Pythagoras first heard music in hammers striking anvils.  The Jews and Christians said it was Jubal in a similar story.  I prefer J.R.R. Tolkien’s version from The Silmarillion, and I’ll leave it in parting since it reminds me of the Pythagoreans.

In the beginning Eru, the One, who in the Elvish tongue is named Ilúvatar, made the Ainur of his thought; and they made a great Music before him. In this Music the World was begun; for Ilúvatar made visible the song of the Ainur, and they beheld it as a light in the darkness. And many among them became enamoured of its beauty, and of its history which they saw beginning and unfolding as in a vision. Therefore Ilúvatar gave to their vision Being, and set it amid the Void, and the Secret Fire was sent to burn at the heart of the World; and it was called Eä.

And now's the time; the time is now

Welcome to my new music blog.  I plan to write occasionally on new music, composition, popular music, aesthetics, and anything else that pops up.  I’ll also share links I run across.  Be sure to subscribe to the RSS feed, and feel free to leave any comments you have–I enjoy discussions more than pronouncements.